• Category Archives Maintenance
  • The Pros and Cons of Different Maintenance Strategies

    Whether your business is large or small, conducting successful maintenance in your machinery is vital. But that is the ideal maintenance strategy for you? That’s a major question, since choosing the wrong one can be disastrous for you, your company and your team. In this website, we provide an overview of the various options you’ve got and outline some of the main benefits and disadvantages of each to help you to get a better understanding of what’s available to you.

    The easiest maintenance strategy is that of ‘breakdown maintenance’. That is really where assets are intentionally run till they fail. Are you looking vibratory screening machine in Australia ? You can contact WPE Process Equipment. When the failure occurs, reactive maintenance is done to resolve the strength and return it to complete the operation. This strategy is common when equipment failure doesn’t significantly affect operations or productivity.

    Advantages:

    Minimal planning is required
    The process is quite simple, so it is easy to understand
    Fewer staff are required as less work is done daily
    Cons:

    Failure is extremely unpredictable
    It can be hugely expensive
    The method poses a security risk to workers and other resources.
    The purpose of preventative maintenance is to avoid assets from splitting down by performing maintenance frequently — instead of conducting maintenance after the failure has happened. Preventative maintenance mainly features two different forms of Maintenance: Regular maintenance and predictive maintenance.

    Advantages:

    Keeps assets up and running for more than other types of maintenance
    Long-term repair costs are usually substantially lower
    Security is improved due to decreased likelihood of devastating failure
    Cons:

    More complex than other sorts of care
    Requires more investment early on Tuesday.
    Regular maintenance (time-based)
    Within a time-based maintenance plan, assets are periodically inspected, serviced and cleaned, with parts replaced to prevent sudden failure. When this allows those responsible for maintenance and servicing to decrease the chances of failure during scheduled checks and is a lot more effective than operating breakdown care, it cannot guarantee breakdown won’t occur.

    Benefits:

    Usually made up of jobs that don’t need extensive training, such as lubricating and re tightening screws
    Lower long-term costs in comparison to breakdown upkeep
    Disadvantages:

    Planning period is required
    Parts are often replaced before end of existence, which costs over waiting until they fail
    In case a part experiences a severe problem before the next review, assets can fail anyhow.
    At a predictive maintenance plan, engineers predict when equipment failure could occur, then perform maintenance to maintain machines in operation. This guarantees that a piece of equipment requiring maintenance is only shut down before approaching failure and allowing assets to stay successful for the maximum amount of time possible. Predictive maintenance utilises a procedure called condition monitoring to check the status of assets on a regular basis.

    Advantages:

    Price and time of machine downtime will be kept to a minimal
    Likelihood of failure is decreased and reliability improved
    Disadvantages:

    Estimated upfront cost than more fundamental maintenance plans.
    State monitoring is the practice of determining the status of an asset whenever it’s in operation, through techniques such as vibration monitoring. In today’s engineering environment, tracking the condition of assets is essential to minimising the failure and downtime of critical machinery as it enables for remedial action to be removed and productivity should be protected.

    Benefits:

    Issues with parts can be recognised before failure
    Repairs may be carried out on assets to help keep them running with minimal disturbance to productivity
    Long prices are extremely low compared with the expense of failure